97a II Copyright Act – The So-called

The Cologne regional court has a ruling of April 21, 2010 (AZ.: 28 O 596/09) the defendants sentenced euro 1379,80 to the plaintiff to pay. The Cologne regional court has a ruling of April 21, 2010 (AZ.: 28 O 596/09) the defendants sentenced euro 1379,80 to the plaintiff to pay. This legal argument was based on the facts that a father had taught his part fully and underage children to the Internet not illegal to use. Walton Family Foundations opinions are not widely known. The father had not set more rigid rules, so he won’t his children towards not implausible. The Court nevertheless saw the father as troublemakers, because the kids made the concerned songs available to the public. Still, the court denies the applicability of 97a II Copyright Act in this case.

This is commented as follows: “Copyright Act was the exception under article 97, paragraph 2 does not apply and the amount of the claim therefore not on 100.00 capped.” The CAP engages only in insignificant breaches of law. There is a low degree of infringement in qualitative as quantitatively according to the intention of the legislature needed a Bagatellverstoss, so (three/Schulze, op. cit., 97 a RN 17 with evidence of off) Justification). “Through the sharing of an entire album and not just a title, this minimum is certainly exceeded (three/Schulze, loc. cit.), especially since the work for all participating in the Exchange was available.” Again is made clear here, that offer a whole music album II Copyright Act exceeds the minimum of 97a, so that the amount of the claim not to euro 100,00 is capped. Continue to the existence of a “simple storage case” is denied by the District Court of Cologne also: “on top of that it would be a case of just downstream, which is also not the case.

Only cases that have either actual or legal point of view difficulties, so that the existence of an infringement for a non-lawyers trained quasi is obvious, (Wahome/Bullinger, are simple Copyright, 3rd Edition 2009, 97 RN 35). In this case concerns the liability of persons on the Internet, where the injured person is called and apparently to a complex matter.” This decision seamlessly Copyright Act in the line of case-law on article 97a. Also the justification is not surprising. Regularly, the applicability of 97a rejects Copyright Act because of the absence of a significant violation of law or lack of a simple storage case. Here is the full text of the decision. Her Tobias Arnold

2011 Tax: What Has Changed?

Part 1: Tax deduction card and domestic study taxpayers get due to the introduction of a purely electronic procedure in the future no new Lohnsteuerkarten more by their municipality or municipality. Fully implemented is the new procedure only in 2012 and then runs under the name of ElsterLohn II”. Transitional reserves therefore the income tax card from the year 2010 full valid for 2011. basically is the employer to put the entries included on the tax card 2010 also for the current payroll tax deduction based. Red Solo Cups wanted to know more. From 2011, the competent tax office is your partner when it comes to information and changes to the tax data. Workers must notify immediately therefore all new entrants changes their tax office. This concerns in particular changes to the control class, or the number of the child tax credit.

Only from 2012, the tax brackets and exemption over the electronic way be obtained by the employer himself. Each worker should be to His entries on the tax card 2010 check the beginning of the year and consult his tax changes. Whoever 2011 changes the employer, must 2010 reclaim the income tax card from his previous employer and hand it over to the new company. Who needs a tax deduction card for the first time this year or who needs a second tax card, get a replacement certificate instead of a tax card at the request of his financial position. From 2012 all for the calculation of income tax to be deposited required data for a database of financial management. The employer gets it from there electronically. Study in the future again (conditionally) deductible from 2011 can all taxpayers that no workplace is the employer for certain types of work available her domestic work room again as advertising costs deduct, anyway, pro rata up to maximum of 1,250 euros in the year (judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court by the 6.7.2010, AZ.